Confucius’s Agnosticism 05.04.08
By Goenawan Lee posted in quote. Saturday, Apr 5th, 2008 at 6:37 pmConfucius (551-479 B.C.) did not throw any light on the problem of origin. He did not speculate on the creation of things nor the end of them. He was not troubled to account for the origin of man, nor did he seek to know about his hereafter. He meddled neither with physics nor metaphysics. There might, he thought, be something on the other side of life, for he admitted the existence of spiritual beings. They had an influence on the living, because they caused them to clothe themselves in ceremonious dress and attend to the sacrificial ceremonies. But we should not trouble ourselves about them, any more than about supernatural things, or physical prowess, or monstrosities. How can we serve spiritual beings while we do not know how to serve men? We feel the existence of something invisible and mysterious, but its nature and meaning are too deep for the human understanding to grasp. The safest, indeed the only reasonable, course is that of the agnostic–to leave alone the unknowable, while acknowledging its existence and its mystery, and to try to understand knowable phenomena and guide our actions accordingly.
…from Myths and Legends of China.
Dalam salah satu wawancara terakhir sebelum ajalnya, Pramoedya Ananta Toer pernah berujar tentang ketidakpercayaannya kepada penguasa, "Saya nggak percaya sama ...
"Pengetahuan menjadi pengetahuan sejati hanya bila diperoleh dengan usaha pemikiran bukan ingatan."
~ Lev Nikolayevitch Tolstoy
Aku memulai dengan mengingat sedikit, maka ...
Engkau pernah bilang kita harus tetap melangkah.
Sudah genap setahun sejak engkau berpulang.
Kuharap engkau bisa melihat langkahku di sini.
Sembari engkau melangkah ...
Orang-orang tua bilang ada ada lima unsur simbolik yang menandakan seorang lelaki bisa menjadi satria Jawa yang paripurna. Masing-masing punya ...
1
From gunawanrudy.com
Confucius can be categorized as a humanistic and rationalistic, also an agnostic who believed in the supernatural (he avoided spiritual things in his teachings) but wasn’t interested in them. And so am I.
2
From Jakarta nazieb.com
But it doesn’t mean that faith is unreasonable, does it?
3
From Jakarta yud1.csui04.net
that sure is one safest way. whether one can live a life contentedly relying on such, IMO is a matter of preference. of course, no one will ever know the unknowable. living contentedly by claiming such will probably needs lots of effort… not something everyone could carry on easily, IMHO.
after all, it’s only a matter of preference about living a one and only life, isn’t it?
4
From Kuala Selangor rosenqueencompany.wordpress.com
Somewhat an application of Stuart’s Wager.
5
From Bandung blackclaw.wordpress.com
There is only one thing for sure. Blogger is Hacker.
—–EOF—–
6
From Kuala Selangor rosenqueencompany.wordpress.com
7
From Jakarta venus-to-mars.com
agnostic? are you?
hmmm…me, too. in a way or anoher
8
From Mojokerto wiki.cahandong.org/Siwi
im a humanistic and rationalistic, and i believed in the supernatural. But i dont know (almost) anything about agnosticism
9
From Jakarta asruldinazis.wordpress.com
dari kemaren mo ngoment tapi ngak tau artinya
btw suka banget sama confisius yakz :?:
10
From Kuala Lumpur baksosuper.com
BTW ente kok nulis religi lagi tho masbro?
11
From Jakarta gielardino.wordpress.com
I’m realistic and logic..
I believe to what I sense, not what I seen…
*cis..cis.. susah juga ngomen boso linggis*
:-]
12
From Semarang findmyishtar.blogspot.com
I do believe there are things beyond our logic, but still i use my logics..
13
From Jakarta haqiqie.wordpress.com
I do realize that I am an agnostic…
Agnosticism in My Mind
Religious Agnostic: An Understanding
14
From Jakarta
Well, saya setuju dengan salah satu ‘pikiran’ Confucius mengenai agnosticism. Yang lain … kurang begitu setuju.